
11-09-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetrapod
What has always struck me as being hypocritical is the lack of effort by animal rights activists (and RSPCA) into pushing for controlled breeding and better accomodation for man's so-called 'best friends' (cats and dogs). It is far easier to attack the more visible zoos, because elephants and big cats should be 'safely' in the wild.
|
You need to look at this in the right perspective. The animal welfare groups [and the animal rights propagandists] all need MONEY.
In an ideal world, the monitoring of true animal welfare would be done by non-aligned, properly trained pros. Unfortunately we do not live in an ideal world, governments have traditionally shirked their responsibility to animals, and so an animal welfare/rights "industry" has flourished. It has flourished to the point that there are now so many of these organisations competing for financial handouts that they have to be increasingly more strident in their claims in order to get publicity. Even the RSPCA has been forced to go down this track. I vividly remember a State director of the RSPCA telling me that if he could get a good anti-circus story on the TV evening news it would be worth $5000 at least in donations to his Society.
Some years ago, Lady Molly Askin [widow of a former NSW Premier] died and left over $1 million to any animal charity that could demonstrate that it was "active" in looking after animals. You should have seen the "activity" levels rise then as they all vied to get the cash!
Of course it is much easier to raise your public profile if you are making outlandish claims about high profile animals - such as our zoo animals.
Unfortunately, the public are so used to stray dogs and cats that they don't raise much interest - "the poor will always be with us" mentality. Yet, as tetrapod has pointed out, that is where the real animal welfare tragedy exists in this day and age.
|