
16-07-2012
Someone (or some people) have worked hard on this site - but I think there is still an awful lot of work to do. It won't take ZooChatters long to spot many mistakes (African elephant and pygmy hippo with rhino and tapir in the Elephant House at Chester!). As Chlidonias remarks, Whipsnade and Regents Park get a paragraph each, while Paignton and its associated collections and the HWP are not even mentioned.
Even worse, for my sensitive soul at least, is the style in which it is written: it reads rather like the script for the commentary on a 1950s newsreel (I could almost hear MacDonald Hobley's voice overstressing all the 'jokes').
But what is it for? It seems to me that an inaccurate list of the things that you can see in the zoos is almost useless without some sort of comparisons between them - it would not be hard to add a 'don't miss' feature selecting the best exhibit(s) in each zoo, but it would need some knowledge and judgement and a little bit of explanation.
PS perhaps someone ought to tell Diamond Publishing Ltd that there are 2 giant pandas at Edinburgh now
Alan
__________________
You've got to find some way of saying it without saying it. Duke Ellington
|