
28-03-2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Dineley
On a wider point, which seems to have only been touched on, if the NZ government think it isn't PC to keep pinnipeds what about the great apes? The husbandry of most commonly kept pippipeds is well codified and no more problematic that other ABC species kept in zoos such as big cats. The idea that suddenly they become persona non grata due to no better reason than the are marine mammals is ludicrous in the extreme.
|
it is worth noting that DoC isn't concerned as an organisation with exotic animals in zoos, it is purely focused on native animals. There may be nothing much different between seals in zoos and, say, big cats or apes in zoos, but the latter aren't native. The whole pinniped decision is probably because they just don't want native pinnipeds captive. Exotic animals (e.g. apes) is the domain of a different department (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, or MaF). Note that the only mammals native to NZ are cetaceans, pinnipeds and bats.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Dineley
I have always had a real problem with the concept that this or that species not being suitable for captive care without recourse to prober investigation. We did this in the UK with the Drs. Klinowska and Brown Review of Dolphinaria as regards cetaceans. The keeping of which hasn't been 'banned' despite the impression given by some groups. And to this end one wonders if the New Zealand's Department of Conservation ever bothered to look at this research when making their decision on cetacean keeping in NZ?
|
also worth noting is that keeping captive cetaceans isn't banned here either. There just aren't any permits being allowed. It results in the same thing, but isn't actually the same (if that makes sense). Its rather a moot point anyway, because as previously mentioned, only one Marineland has been in operation here for a very long time and that facility has itself now been closed for quite a while.
|