
07-01-2010
phoenix,
The reasoning for no/yes last ditch has been precipitated only due to Dvur's intervention. As I observed before there has never been any love lost on the Congolese authorities to effectively protect the northern white rhinos.
Why no sooner a rescue op.? Dvur really tried before the 2003 term just prior to when the 2nd recent big poaching scandal had the fans. The northern white pop. had been hovering at the 30+/- mark for more than a decade .... and the Garamba park was never able to withstand any prolonged poaching without outside funding and technical back-up. It seems kinda sad that - in hindsight - WWF never put the brake on and demanded D.R. Congo COOPERATE with regional rhino authorities in IUCN/SSC to relocate part of the population elsewhere (something that is a more than sensible approach when a population is the low and so beset with frequent in-roads in pop. increase ....).
Perhaps, it is a firm reminder to us all that we should do our utmost and establish back-up populations ex situ, in situ, in semi-captive or whatever when any species is restricted to one locale only. Hopefully, IUCN may take this policy further ... is all I can say.
Genetics: indeed the diversity is rather low at 4+3 (probably some relatedness in there too). Apart, biological materials have been preserved for several other northern whites in Dvur and San Diego (to enable broadening the genetics base ... if only marginally). However, even the southern whites were down to 20+/- in the early 1900's and now there is 17,500.
However, I agree ... it could and should have been much sooner. I just like to make it clear that Dvur zoo people were never ever the stumbling block.
Sadly, even EAZA and some US captive rhino folks have opposed this last ditch effort. .... I do not care there ... as I suppose the money was donated by third sources anyway ... and so the deal does not lose any other more promising rhino conservation projects any cash.
K.B.
|