
10-05-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maguari
I have never heard of the European subspecies doing the same; they may, but even if they do, the association isn't there in the minds of the public or those designing the exhibits.
|
I think for European, or certainly UK zoo-goers, a Bear enclosure like this one at Whipsnade is regarded as a highly natural/ great exhibit etc because overall we have no very grand exhibits such as outlined above in some of the USA Zoos. They are virtually nonexistent (except for Polar Bears) in our part of the world, probably because bears are not as emblamatic over here as in the states.
As you said, perception about how the Bears live comes into it too. European Bears don't normally fish rivers for salmon(except in places like the Russian Far East) and are more likely to be found rootling in woodlands or emerging to steal honey from farmers' hives in a meadow. So the Whipsnade exhibit, despite being simple and very old, still matches that vision. Also compared to many of the ghastly standardised concrete cells and pits that Brown Bears have often lived in, and still do, in many Europe zoos, it seems like a paradise. Of course even Whipsnade have been guilty of other 'bad' bear enclosures in the past- Spectacleds, Polars and Kodiaks.
Last edited by Pertinax; 10-05-2011 at 09:19 PM..
|