
26-01-2009
I am "SO NEGATIVE" because San Diego Zoo, despite all the things it has going for it (climate, money, public support, history, topography, collection, oh and did I say money?) has NEVER stretched itself to truly meet it's potential. I am amazed that even this group of well-informed zoo afficianados are consistently blinded by the hype and the benign Southern Californian climate to really BELIEVE that the zoo is the world's greatest.
Don't get me wrong, there are many very good aspects to the zoo (notably the walk-through aviaries, outdoor reptile exhibits, Tiger River, Kopje exhibit, subtropical plantings everywhere among them). But if the zoo ever paid attention to details the way other zoos do (think Arizona Sonora Desert Museum, Woodland Park, Bronx, Shedd, Monterey, Zurich, Arnhem, Leipzig) it would be SO much better it would blow every other zoo out of the water. The equivalent in sports terms would be a player with immense natural talents who doesn't practice and only performs when the spotlight is on.
I've waited for years to see the zoo step up to the top in terms of QUALITY. When Tiger River and the Kopje exhibits opened in the late 1980s, it looked like the zoo was on its way. But nothing since that time has had the same level of thoughtfulness or quality. I had hoped to be proven wrong by Elephant Odyssey--but the plan published today (the most detailed yet) supports my suspicion that the San Diego Zoo will still not live up to it's potential, which is a shame for them, but more broadly a shame for all zoos as the public continues to regard San Diego as the "leader," and will judge all zoos by what they do. This group (Zoochat contributors) should know better....
|