
08-04-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick
what was she wearing last week?
triffle those are interesting ideas, like the idea of a riverbank type exhibit but its a tad impractical for the reasons glyn stated (most notably the phase out of malayan tapir).
the reasons i suggested primate islands was because;
a) i believe the gibbons in particular deserve more space.
b) i was suggesting a short-term resolution to improve the life an thematics of the entire zoo with very minimal effort.
long-term though i do like the asian riverbank theme. there are plenty of smaller reptiles and fish that could incorporate into it.
on that note, what happened to the giant gourami in the "elephant research station"... he was cool.
|
I do like the idea of developing primate islands within the Asian rainforest and would be happy to see the Asian lake used for this or the riverbanks exhibits (I would basically just want to see the Asian lake used for something).
I have been aware that the zoo are phasing out tapirs, so it was more of an optimistic suggestion as I quite like the tapirs. I can't see why M. Zoo couldn't just reverse their stance and get some tapirs (or have they still got one?). There is certainly enough land to build a quality exhibit.
The reason why I would prefer the Asian lake to be developed into a riverbanks themed area is because it would a) Give Melbourne Zoo a unique exhibit b) Would greatly expand the SE Asian rainforests animal collection with the inclusion of fishing cats, reptiles, fish, water birds and (possibly) tapirs c) Allow for the M. Zoo to utilise the area between the tigers & elephants to be developed into an extended aboreal primates precinct, thus keeping most of the primates in the same area while being developed into two sections.
If the islands were used to house the gibbons and langurs, what should the area between the tigers and elephants be developed into (considering the goal of building more spacious aboreal primates exhibits would be easily meet without taking up any of the additional land, as the tree-top walk would feature only 5 species instead of 7)?
|