ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Oceania > Australia > Sydney Wildlife World

Notices

Sydney Wildlife World » Sydney Wildlife World

More from Sydney Wildlife World: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Zooish's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunny Singapore
Posts: 435
Photos: 263
  #1
Sydney Wildlife World
Old 05-07-2006

Hi guys, I just stumbled upon an article about the new Sydney Wildlife World zoo. It seems to be sparking a lot of controversy - cannibalising on Taronga as well as its poor choice of location so near the city.

Its website claims that it will house 6,000 animals in a 7,000 square metre area, isn't that a bit cramped?

Any more info on this place?
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,369
Photos: 56
  #2
Old 05-07-2006

COuld you post a link to the webpage?

found it
http://www.sydneywildlifeworld.com.au

i know adelaide are sending some YFRW to Sydney Aquarium maybe thats where they are going
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #3
Old 05-07-2006

yea i have been following this one,

its in association with the aqaurium, its right nest door, all animals willbe put in to sound proof bunkers of sorts when fireworks are on, cause its right on the harbour, in saying tht, u stand at the aqaurium and boom, there the harbour bridge.

wht else do u wanna no?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #4
Old 05-07-2006

the sydney aquarium is located in darling harbour, which is not particuarly close to the harbour bridge (think your confused Zoo_Boy). i used to work just around the corner from there. that said, fireworks could nonetheless still pose a problem for the animals. i belive darling harbour do have fireworks displays also from time to time. it wasn't finished last time i was down there, but essentially it looked like a massive aviary. i suppose many of the animals wil all be free-ranging in there.

personally i thought it was a little wierd that they did it. the aquarium should have stuck to fish if you ask me. they certainly will affect taronga attendance, which is largely OS tourists, as these sorts of people are predominantly interested in australian fauna and they can now see most of the at the aquarium, as well as fish etc and without the expenses and hassle of the ferry to taronga...
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #5
Old 05-07-2006

sorry pat but yes it is, you have to pass the aquarium(well sorta over it) to get on to the bridge, probably about .5 - 1 k if that. sorry but its right near it. darling habour has the biggest firework display in the world when it come to new year, so the animals are being put in bunkers to cope with this. when we drove past the aquarium on our way to taronga, the skydome was just being added, and there were huge mature trees which where brought in to the site. its going to be amazing for the visitior, but not so for animals and taronga.

it was proposed (turned down by taronga) that the aqarium/ozzie world, would do packages to the zoo.

but for the international tourists, it would be good, as you can see fish and native mamals all under one roof.






go to http://www.fabricstructures.com.au/projects.htm for details
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #6
Old 05-07-2006

http://www.fabricstructures.com.au/d...dlifeWorld.pdf

for current construction pics
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #7
Old 05-07-2006

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/...335930406.html
current over head shot sydney morning herald
Zooish's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunny Singapore
Posts: 435
Photos: 263
  #8
Old 06-07-2006

Thanks guys for the additional info. The concept of an urban 'boutique' zoo is interesting, making it more convenient and comfortable for visitors, but it also means compromising on space. So i'm guessing the largest animal to be exhibited is the YTRW?

Personally as a tourist, this zoo would attract me more than Taronga as it is a specialized collection rather than another "typical" zoo. We had a debate on another thread about how zoos need to differentiate from one another in order to be successful.

Taronga should be feeling the impact when SWW opens. Keep us posted on the developments.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wellington , New Zealand
Posts: 811
  #9
Central city mini zoo
Old 06-07-2006

I remember coming across this a number of years ago , and asking Sim more about it . If its the one on the Downtown side of Darling harbour , near the aquiriam , it will be the same place !

This is my earlier input on the same topic

Senior Zookeeper


Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wellington , New Zealand
Posts: 251 New zoo for downtown Sydney

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inner Sydney to get new zoo Sydney, New South Wales, Australia


from Zoo News 307 by Monika Fiby Thursday, 2004-09-02

The New South Wales Government has given planning permission for a small zoo to be built next to the Sydney Aquarium at Darling Harbour.

The building - to be known as Australia's Animal World - will house exhibits of native animals, including snakes, spiders, koalas and wombats. Its construction will involve the demolition of parts of the existing buildings owned by Sydney Aquarium. The application for the facility was submitted in 2002. Concerns were raised by conservationists about the welfare of wildlife in the inner city location. The project will cost $30 million and is expected to create 40 new full-time jobs.

Do you know of this one , Sim ? How much living space do wombats need when they are in the wild ? I know of the area where the zoo will be in -- it is not exactly what I would call large . I wonder what other native animals they intend to exhibit ?
As Taronga Park is quite close to the city ( about 10 minute ferry ride) I dont think they can state location as being a good enough reason to have a "zoo" in a small area with limited ( if any ) room to expand for future development -- especially if there are going to be mammals/marsupials etc

Last edited by Nigel; 06-07-2006 at 02:44 PM.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 105
Photos: 3
  #10
Old 25-03-2008

I think Sydney Wildlife World is just a gimmicky tourist trap to lure tourists who are too lazy to take the ferry to the zoo or who are too addicted to gambling to travel too far from Star City, trust me I am Asian and I know for a fact tons of tourists from all over Asia visit Sydney just to gamble and to see the harbor and these are the sort of people who would actually visit such a facility.

Personally I have seen virtually all of the species housed there and for a facility that only exhibits Australian animals $29.90 entry is just too steep.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #11
Old 25-03-2008

i went, though for free, i do agree the fee is to high, and the zoo is worth it, i actually really enjoyed sww, the exhibits were above what i expected, and despite being on the harbour, i may have well been in a purpose buitl facility at taronga.
Sim's Avatar
Sim
Administrator
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, AUS
Posts: 1,079
Photos: 968
  #12
Old 25-03-2008

Just don't visit after hours - SWW is open until 9pm, but when it is dark outside, they turn out the lights in the large exhibits and you can't see anything!

When we visited, there were some tourists there with children who were very upset that they paid all this money to see animals - and you can't see them because the lights are out!

Very bad planning - a case of money over common sense.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #13
Old 25-03-2008

well i still dont see why it needs to be open after 5 pm- or even 7, with out reduced admission, or even installing a red spectrum series of lights for exhibits. Even so, i still dont think animals should be on display that long.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #14
Old 25-03-2008

i will never-ever pay to go to this ******** - on principal. what happened with the leaving ARAZPA fiasco? i certainly hope some of their animals got taken back!!
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Abbotsford, B.C., Canada
Posts: 5,389
Photos: 8,799
  #15
Old 25-03-2008

Sydney Wildlife World is of course a little "touristy" and "gimmicky", but it also succeeds at the basic level of introducing foreign visitors to Australian wildlife. The 9 different sections are all tastefully done, especially the invertebrate and reptile areas. I touched 2 lizards and 2 snakes while there (under the supervision of guides), admired the cassowary up close behind glass, and enjoyed the arid desert background of the rock wallabies. It's expensive and yet informative. The key is to visit the SWW, the Sydney Aquarium and Taronga Zoo to get a full dose of captive wildlife.
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)