
18-09-2007
i have seen both facilities, the land size is roughly the same for both developemnts, but taronga encorperated more exhibits, melb has more interp such as the research hbut, a nice little village.
i think melbournes is best due to the rotation and variations in the paddocks, and just the whole manageablitly of the facility. i would have liked to see now what i have read about other ele exhibits. at denver, there new exhibit will have 5 paddocks, for 3 species (ele, rhino, tapir) more than 2 exhibit can be used at a time, for eg, they can connect the 3 back exhibits so they are all open to eles at once, or a mix of 3, but what im getting at, is that instead of using the visitor paths 2 move, the eles travel over via a bridge, therefore the whole facilitiy can be open, whilst the public is around. sorry a little confusing, see there site.
what does melbourne do? do the open the hill exhibit, and the bull exhibit to make alrge 1 for the females? or are the 3 exhibits, during visitor hours, always kept separate?
on this also, melbourne is better equiped form introductions, with a bull etc through the fence, just the mngmt of the facility overall i saw as great! i spent most my day in that facility and it was great, whilst taronga has more species, melb has a betta developed trail previous.
i hope i have made sense i have been having many diff converstaions whilst writing this, whilst in class! lol 1 month exactly to HSC!
|