ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Oceania > Australia > Taronga Zoo

Notices

What happened to the xxxx enclosure/exhibit? » Taronga Zoo

More from Taronga Zoo: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,092
  #61
Old 06-11-2008

Hi NZ Jeremy, I feel the need to clear something up.

Snowleopard had posted this comment about me.
@zooman: it's frustrating to read your posts as your spelling and grammar are atrocious, but you do offer unique perspectives and do have a lot of knowledge of primates.

I replied that i read this comment to say

removed
__________________
Stuart R Webster
A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead

Last edited by ZooYouthBen; 07-11-2008 at 06:28 PM.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: austraia
Posts: 6
  #62
Old 07-11-2008

Hi Just wanted to say thanks to Hix for posting those pictures. The explanations were great too. It certainly brings back memories. I feel old now...

How come the orangutans enclosures were allowed to be destroyed and not treated as heritage listed like the seal ponds, elephant enclosure etc? I remember for a while they had set up old pictures and a bit of history in one of them and we could walk in there? Is my memory serving me correctly or am I thinking of something else?

So with all the changes to the tiger and lion pits, what is the night time/back of house cages set up like?

Also with alll the animals (especialy bigger animals like the elephants, cats, bear) how trained are they to obey keepers? in regards to things like feeding, getting animals to go to their night time areas, medical procedures etc? Is it all done with food rewards? Like how the hell could you get the big kodiak bear to go inside if he doesnt want to? Or one of the tigers?
torie's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 398
Photos: 89
  #63
Old 07-11-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoofan12 View Post
Also with alll the animals (especialy bigger animals like the elephants, cats, bear) how trained are they to obey keepers? in regards to things like feeding, getting animals to go to their night time areas, medical procedures etc? Is it all done with food rewards? Like how the hell could you get the big kodiak bear to go inside if he doesnt want to? Or one of the tigers?
its quite simple really... dont feed them untill they come inside!!! the lions, bears, tigers ect are feed their evning meals inide as incentive to come inside at the end of the day. as with medical procedures just injectns and simple things like that are done with target traning thgough the bars of the night dens. the sun bears are also trained to open their mouths onthe bars to have their teeth cleaned!!
Hix's Avatar
Hix
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 867
Photos: 1,905
  #64
Old 07-11-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoofan12 View Post
How come the orangutans enclosures were allowed to be destroyed and not treated as heritage listed like the seal ponds, elephant enclosure etc? I remember for a while they had set up old pictures and a bit of history in one of them and we could walk in there? Is my memory serving me correctly or am I thinking of something else?
As I understand it, the orang house was never heritage listed. Plus, it's back wall blocked the best view in the zoo. The building was pulled down and the current free-flight bird theatre is in it's place. The elephant temple was transformed into a museum recently, showing old photos of the temple, enclosure and the history of elephants at Taronga. That's now been closed due to renovations to the exhibit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoofan12 View Post
So with all the changes to the tiger and lion pits, what is the night time/back of house cages set up like?
Much better than the old days when you felt like you were walking through a dark cave (and Kutch, the lion, would scare the crap out of you when you walked past his cage!)



Hix
NZ Jeremy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,147
Photos: 89
  #65
Old 07-11-2008

No worries zooman, I was just joking around, just dreaming of the old days when Patrick would sling a hilarious barb at one of us...

In fact could one of the mods (MARK I'm looking at you) delete all my posts on the last two pages..?
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,371
Photos: 56
  #66
Old 07-11-2008

Am i not good enough for you!

Ask and you shall recieve, Just reitteratiing Can everyone please stay on topic!!!!!!!!!
boof's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thirroul,nsw,australia
Posts: 513
Photos: 70
  #67
Old 07-11-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoofan12 View Post
heritage listed like the seal ponds, elephant enclosure etc??
I reckon heritage listing old exhibits is a crock of ****. All it does is prevent the zoo from moving forward. It is a huge track of land that the zoo can't utilise by not being able to bulldoze the old pools. There is also the two old avaries near the old penguin pools that serve no purpose other than looking untidy.

Get in a professional photographer, take some photos of the heritage listed areas, put them in a book for the half a dozen people who are interested in old exhibits then knock them down and move forward.

Hix' photos have shown that the old exhibits don't have to be around for people to be able to remember the old lay out of the zoo.

P.S I have pretty much said the same thing in an earlier thread about the spider monkey exhibit.
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Abbotsford, B.C., Canada
Posts: 5,408
Photos: 8,799
  #68
Old 07-11-2008

I am in 100% agreement with boof, and the heritage listing of specific sites on a zoo's grounds simply hinders progress, stalls expansion projects, and basically leaves the zoo in limbo in terms of excavating the land. It's amazing that visitors have to stare at brutal exhibits that are antiquated and due for demolition...but because they are so damn old nothing can be done in terms of complete obliteration.
glyn's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,868
Photos: 36
  #69
Old 08-11-2008

i disagree, in certain cases. so far, heritage listings have not hindered a single development at taronga.
so far every mega-exhibit at taronga has incorporated some heritage listed building or a hsitoric structure/object. in every case they have enhanced the exhibits.
however, i do concede that Taronga has the budget to restore these listed or historic buildings/artefacts. in some cases, as in the aviaries on the main drive or the seal pools or the spider monkey exhibit, they could be either re-worked for other species or in the case of the aviaires I would like to see them restored and left vacant as an interpretive exhibit. as just about all the mentioned heritage buildings lie in the proposed 'heart of the zoo' they are conveniently positioned for this heritage themed precinct.
Hix's Avatar
Hix
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 867
Photos: 1,905
  #70
Old 09-11-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
so far every mega-exhibit at taronga has incorporated some heritage listed building or a hsitoric structure/object. in every case they have enhanced the exhibits.
What heritage listed building/structure/object is incorporated into the Wollemi walk-thru, or the Asian Elephant exhibit?



Hix
glyn's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,868
Photos: 36
  #71
Old 09-11-2008

WILD ASIA has the original deer shelter in it. and i didnt really include wollemi as a mega-exhibit/precinct as such, because although it falls under the current master-plan it doesnt really fit the category of a mega-exhibit in my eyes (for budget/size reasons).
the point i was trying to make is that in these times of massive development at taronga these huge projects which are at the fore of 21sr century zoo design are embracing and incorporating heritage, not bulldozing but instead re-working it.
its nice to see.
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,092
  #72
Old 09-11-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowleopard View Post
I am in 100% agreement with boof, and the heritage listing of specific sites on a zoo's grounds simply hinders progress, stalls expansion projects, and basically leaves the zoo in limbo in terms of excavating the land. It's amazing that visitors have to stare at brutal exhibits that are antiquated and due for demolition...but because they are so damn old nothing can be done in terms of complete obliteration.
I am well aware, as my local zoo has been affected. By heritage listings of zoo buildings.

However l believe that the education of the public comes in many forms. To have the old style of enclosure. As an example of how far animal husbandry has come over the years. Is an exceptional education tool. We know the public are not reading the signs!!!

A measure of success, is not always what has been achieved, but more accurately by where we have come from.
__________________
Stuart R Webster
A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead
boof's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thirroul,nsw,australia
Posts: 513
Photos: 70
  #73
Old 09-11-2008

I hardly think keeping a deer shelter has enhanced wild asia.
The only heritage building worth keeping is the elephant temple. The old pools or the old avairies are not what you would call significant examples of old exhibits, are they?
torie's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 398
Photos: 89
  #74
Old 09-11-2008

was at the zoo today and they have filled up the two end old seal pools (furthest away from wollimi) and installed three large water fountian things, will up load photos later today or tomorrow, and just pulled the wire fencing down from the other two. i think this is a bit of a waste yes the fountains look good but if the pools werent listed they could easily have put two averies or another animal exhibit.
the old seal theater, holding pools and penguin pools have been completly demolished.
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,371
Photos: 56
  #75
Old 09-11-2008

I imagine that would be alot of dirt...Look forward to pictures.
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)