ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Asia > Japan > Adventure World

Notices

Panda news » Adventure World

More from Adventure World: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #1
Panda news
Old 28-12-2006

Great news, TWIN Giant Panda cubs have just been born in Japan, they are doing well, great stuff.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #2
Old 28-12-2006

mark, at which zoo?

there is a zoo in japan that OWNS its male panda (as opposed to china owning them) likewise a zoo in mexico OWNS 3 females. for years these zoos have desperately been trying to breed them so that they can continue to keep animals without having to pay the million a year charge to rent additional animals.. could it be?
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #3
Old 28-12-2006

Yer Pat, both Pandas are own by China and are on LOAN, the twins were born at the Adventure world in Wakayama, 280 miles south west of Tokyo. There is a nice photo of mother and babies at Washingtonpost.com, the female Meli Meli is 12 and the Male Emel is 14.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #4
Old 30-12-2006

Patrick- you are correct- there is a male Panda in Japan owned by the zoo rather than by China as they used to be gifts rather than loans- similarly West Berlin's male Bao Bao, the oldest Panda in captivity is owned by the zoo as he arrived in the era when pandas were gifted, not rented.. The Mexico ones too as their pair were gifts so the offspring are too- they did try to breed one female with the Japanese male several times but each time it failed- two of the three Mexican females are likely past breeding age, and the third not far off. You can get details of names, location etc from San Diego Zoo website which has masses of Panda information. San Diego want to retain the cubs they are breeding but at present are still obliged to return them to China too.

Why do the Chinese breeding centres like Wolong remove their naturally raised cubs from the mothers at such an early age? To increase the breeding rate? It can't be natural and the cubs could suffer from socialisation problems later.
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #5
Old 30-12-2006

Could removing the cubs early make the female Panda come back into heat sooner?, maybe this could be a reason for that. Yer the off srping of any Pandas born at San Diego zoo have to be returned to China by their third birthday. I would like to go and see the Panda station at Wolong in the next few years, i would really like to see the chinese Golden monkeys so I will try and find out what places are holding them before i went over there. Cool animals.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #6
rearing pandas....
Old 30-12-2006

no, their is a very good reason why the panda centres remove offspring...

pandas often give birth to twins, but only one usually survives. so they started taking one baby panda away and attempting to hand rear it - only to discover there was still a very high mortality rate. so they experimented with "switching" the cubs every few days to be blessed with great success. the panda mother nontheless recognised both her cubs and fed and cared for them both irrespective of who was taken away first. it seems that by half hand rearing both cubs, the chance of success with both was very high. it seems formula alone is not good for the cubs, but subtitute it with just 50% mothers milk and some quality time with mum and the pandas grow up fine. i haven't read of any behavioural problems that i know of. but you must remeber these are captive animals, and do not live a "natural" life anyway...
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #7
Old 30-12-2006

Great news Pandas are breeding so well, would anyone know how that captive bred Panda is going that was released back into the wild?.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #8
rearing pandas
Old 30-12-2006

Patrick- no, the twins rearing method is a seperate issue. It doesn't explain why all young Pandas at the rearing stations in China are removed at such an early age. One year there were sixteen Panda cubs produced and all were shown together in a Panda nursery.Only some were from twin births, the others were single births. I think Mark is nearer the point- early removal of the cub means they can breed from the female again the following year, instead of only every second or third year.
At San Diego a zoo-born cub is still living with and interacting with its mother at over 18 months of age, so probably still learning from her too. The Chinese breeding stations have obviously found the way to produce larger numbers quickly with this early weaning policy. Will these Pandas be normally socalised as they grow up, without adult contact?.

Incidentally, San Diego's Panda complex is big enough to house up to six pandas, one reason they are trying to get China to allow them to keep the cubs they breed.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #9
panda twins
Old 30-12-2006

The way they rear twin Pandas is intruguing as it means the female must be very tolerant of disturbance- even though they swap the twins over while she is shut out of the den, it does mean someone must enter it quite often. Maybe this is because these Pandas are used to people all around.

This is another way of increasing the population rapidly, as they are successfully raising each set of twins produced, instead of losing one of them.
I think I prefer this to the idea of forcing the females to breed more often by removing the young so early.
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Online
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #10
Old 04-01-2007

In the news today, 34 Giant Panda cubs were born in China in 2006, 4 of those died, wow, great stuff, hope next year is a good one as well.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #11
Unhappy baby pandas
Old 07-01-2007

Yeah, more pictures for the world press of a load of confused -looking baby pandas altogether- I'll bet none of them will see their mothers again. I think that this is cruelty in the name of conservation.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #12
Old 08-01-2007

unless the animals are concived with twins, its common in pandas, and the park may take 1 cub before she kills one, there fore getting twice as many pandas?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #13
Old 08-01-2007

oh okay i get it - two seperate issues it is.

to be honest, i know nothing much about the issue. i have watched a documentary about the "twin switching" method at one of the centres. they implied that they only did it with twins as all other pandas appeared to stay with their mothers....(?)

china can breed as many pandas and tigers as they like, but unles they start better protecting and restoring habitat - they really have nowhere to put them...

pity nodody ever tried to breed yangtze dolphins...
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #14
Old 08-01-2007

it is a shame, but then gain it would have be very ahrd, especially to get wild animals accustom to humans, and there would have been a huge need, but who knows maybe one day they will jst pop back again, a secret population. we can dream pat.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne, victoria, australia
Posts: 2,884
Photos: 21
  #15
Old 08-01-2007

oh if only zooboy if only.

i have followed the plight of the yangtze dolphin for only the last 7 years or so... even then back in 2000 there may have been a very miniscule chance of saving them. but in this particular species case, it represents a gross, gross failure of conservation groups to do anything for them at all. all that happened was a monitoring of a species decline, with nothing proactive to save it.

the situation with the yangtze dolphin was so bad - that leaving the species in the wild was to accept its eventual extinction. this was accepted by most for years, decades in fact, yet nothing was done and internal bickering amongst those few trying to save it resulted in a complete failure of their mission.

whilst the (comparitively common) minke, humbacks and other marine cetaceans recived the bulk of all conservation funding, the most endangered of them all and the worlds rarest mammal, got its funing pulled by the WDCS - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society.

doesn't that seem rediculous? (i'll try and find the email they sent me some years ago justifying their reasons because the first captured dolphin drowned when relocated to the new protected preserve)

the only way to save this species was to, as controversial as it seemed, catch them all and relocate them.

so whilst pandas recieved millions to be bred in captivity because they were cute and people tried to teach chinese tigers to hunt in africa a gorgeous freshwater dolphin, a dolphin (how charismatic is that!) in one of the worlds most famous rivers, slipped into extinction in the modern world.

and most people whouldn't have a clue what the hell it is...

unfortunately, if there are any left at all - it can really only be one or two (the recent survety scoured the entire legnth of the river using sonar) - so the species is funtionally extinct anyway. Qi Qi the only animal that was ever kept in captivity dies a few years ago and whilst DNA samples were taken - i don't belive any exist of any other specimens. a female was captured at one stage but instead of being paired with Qi Qi was placed in the preserve and drowned in a net designed to keep her in.

its particuarly frustrating to me since i have followed the story with such interest for so long. i have written to get different conservation groups to support an immediate project of action and i have watched and read intently as nothing happened and old out-dated information continued to circle that gave a false sense of security....
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)