
15-03-2008
okay please - no more mentions of A Night at the Museum guys, come up with something else, we get it!!!
this is a bit of along shot but here goes...
Jurassic Park, both the book and film is absolutely full of errors. okay put aside that the dinosaurs are brought to life bit, thats (very good) science fiction. fine.
but the all the amber in the film/book comes from the dominican republic, only the dinosaur species come from all over the world and at all different time periods. an amber deposit is generally always going to be from teh same time period and all the dinosaur DNA found in such must be local. but okay, maybe all these spacies live in that place at that time and we have just never found eidence for that - forgivable.
but dilophosaurus had no neck frill. pteranodon (in JP3) do have teeth! also in the appalingly bad 3rd film was spinosaurus which was no way near as big and heavily built as it was in the film. it was longer than t-rex, but certainly wasn't larger. the velociraptor's in the film are actually made-up in design, more heavily based apon another larger dromaeosaurid called deinonychus. velociraptor was knee-high with a long thin snout. not nearly as scary (but with a pretty cool name, hence they became "raptors). speaking of which at teh start of teh film alan grant is digging up a "raptor" in montana - even though this species is only known from mongolia!
all in all it can easily be explained within context of the story, i mean who said the jurassic park scientists didn't just name teh animals after more well known relatives for publicity, but if being picky. its full of errors.
still fun though!
|