
16-11-2007
Ok bear in mind Africa can provide easily enough food for itself, it is not that it's too hot, or the people unable, but that the World Bank and International Monetary Fund have systematically undermined the food sovereignty of poorer nations and this only accelerated after the oil hike in the 70's and the ensuing debt of those countries. Yes they could have not agreed to be loaned the money in the first place but many of these were only recently independent of colonial rule, many still had corrupt puppets installed by the west, still true in many places today. If they were not pushed to grow for export and didn't have their grain markets devalued with the dumping of gentically modified food as aid, enough food could be grown for people in Africa without more land being taken from wildlife. It frustrates me that we expect many african nations to preserve their wildlife when they are being bled dry by the international financial bodies that could do so much to help them.
Its kind of a matter of perspective, in the UK here we have more plant biodiversity in habitats created or maintained by humans than in the old forests felled in neolithic times. But then we have no bears, wolves, lynx anymore. I guess in Australia its not people that are the problem, but the animals they brought with them.
As for AIDS, does anyone even still believe that was an accident? I think in 20 years or so things will really start to come out about how that started, and how it managed to get round Africa so fast.
|