ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Europe > Austria > Vienna Zoo

Notices

Austrian Zoos » Vienna Zoo

More from Vienna Zoo: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,413
Photos: 423
  #31
Old 27-01-2008

This is the parks species list...
Tiergarten Schönbrunn / Vienna Zoo
Sun Wukong's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,495
Photos: 636
  #32
Old 28-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fodders View Post
What is vienna zoo like, apart from the pandas? Are there any rare species kept there?
What about reading Page 1 of this thread...?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 574
  #33
Old 30-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pygathrix View Post
What if you had a pair which produced two sets of twins in two years? (highly unlikely I know) - it could bankrupt the zoo!
Sorry to quote myself...I just read that Hua Mei who was born in San Diego in 1999 had her third set of twins in under 3 years at Wolong...this probably wouldn't have happened if she'd stayed at SD though because the babies are not taken away from their mothers at such a young age
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #34
Old 30-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pygathrix View Post
..this probably wouldn't have happened if she'd stayed at SD though because the babies are not taken away from their mothers at such a young age
What do you think about the Chinese Panda 'factories'(Wolong, Chengdu) where they take the babies away while still very young, presumably in order to get the mothers to breed again sooner? I've seen photos where the whole years 'crop' of babies- up to 16 young pandas- are shown with their keepers in a panda 'nursery'. These include many mother-reared babies which presumably won't see their mothers again... Surely it can't be good for their social development to be removed from the parent so early, and stressful for the mother pandas who have been rearing their babies.

In the wild the cub stays with mother a lot longer, and they've followed this pattern too at San Diego- much more beneficial for both mother and cub.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 574
  #35
Old 30-01-2008

Hi Grant, yes this has been touched on before

http://www.zoobeat.com/19/panda-news-2636/

There was that amazing photo of a keeper in a room with 16 cubs of various ages, but all looked under a year old. I don't know anything about this but would assume that the young are removed to encourage earlier oestrus in the mothers. It would be interesting to see how this translates into second generation breeding from animals which have been reared in this way, how they socialise, and what the success rate is with attempted reintroductions.
Sun Wukong's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,495
Photos: 636
  #36
Old 31-01-2008

I have been to both Chengdu & Wolong. What can I say? You can sure have second thoughts about it-but the reversion of the infant mortality numbers is impressive.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #37
Old 01-02-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Wukong View Post
I have been to both Chengdu & Wolong. What can I say? You can sure have second thoughts about it-but the reversion of the infant mortality numbers is impressive.
Surely once the mother-reared cubs are furred and their eyes open etc there's no danger of infant mortality anymore. Don't they worry the cubs removed at an early age(I'm talking about those where the mother is rearing her cub properly) will not be properly socialised when they grow up, or do they think the company of all the other young Pandas is sufficient?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #38
Old 01-02-2008

It was on the TV news last night that Vienna's Panda cub is now on show with its mother.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
  #39
Old 01-02-2008

My understanding is that all the cubs born in the chinese breeding facilities are mainly raised by their mothers for 6 months and removed then to be raised with other cubs so that the mothers gets pregnant the next breeding season and has cubs each year, while in the wild (and in San Diego) the females have cubs only every 2 years. "Mainly" raised by their mothers means that the keepers check them closely, remove them very often (daily) for checks and if a females has twins, they will rotate the cubs between the mother and the nursery. Experience has shown that females hardly ever can provide adequate care for twins so they take one from her after birth, care for it for 12 hours or so, and then give it back to the mother and take the other one into the nursery. This way each cub gets 50 % of the mother`s milk and proper socialisation and the infant mortality has dropped dramatically. I am not at all happy that the chinese still seperate the cubs from their mothers at 6 months, it is no longer necessary to produce that many cubs each year to sustain the captive population, but from the social point of view, 6 months with the mother is probably enough for a panda to learn social behavoir and that he/she is a giant panda and not a human, lol. A lot of the breeding pandas in China must be captive born and it seems it causes no problems. But for release, I would always make sure the panda is raised by its mother for 1,5 years and with as few contact to humans as possible...
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,614
Photos: 21
  #40
Old 01-02-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yassa View Post
My understanding is that all the cubs born in the chinese breeding facilities are mainly raised by their mothers for 6 months and removed then to be raised with other cubs so that the mothers gets pregnant the next breeding season and has cubs each year, while in the wild (and in San Diego) the females have cubs only every 2 years. I am not at all happy that the chinese still seperate the cubs from their mothers at 6 months, it is no longer necessary to produce that many cubs each year to sustain the captive population, but from the social point of view, 6 months with the mother is probably enough for a panda to learn social behavoir and that he/she is a giant panda and not a human, lol. But for release, I would always make sure the panda is raised by its mother for 1,5 years and with as few contact to humans as possible...
Yes, the procedure for rearing twins- removing them alternately from the mother so each is 50% mother-raised, has certainly increased the number of cubs surviving. I don't object to that at all- they are manipulating them but the mother is able to fulfil her maternal instinct normally.

But I think removing cubs at six months must be stressful for the mothers in particular and as you said, I don't think they need to get their females to breed every year now- surely the breeding facilities must be overrun with the young Pandas they have produced in recent years? For release programmes too I would definately agree the mothers and young should stay together for the more natural 1.5 years to ensure the young Panda is fully socialised. For those staying in captivity maybe six months is sufficient if they're in continual contact with other pandas afterward- thought it still smacks of 'Panda factory' to me and seems unnecessary .
Maguari's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 403
Photos: 1,976
  #41
Old 04-02-2008

Just spotted this thread so late to the party!

I can definitely recommend Vienna, Innsbruck and Salzburg. I've just added some photos of Salzburg to my gallery - http://www.zoobeat.com/gallery/showg...er/426/cat/500.

The Haus der Natur natural history museum and terrarium in Salzburg is very good - I'll try to get some pictures of that up later.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 574
  #42
Giant Pandas in Vienna
Old 24-04-2008

ISIS currently lists 2.2 with 2 births in the past 12 months. Is this another ISIS mistake? The first baby was only born in August 2007 so this hardly seems possible. No mention of this on the zoo's website.
Maguari's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 403
Photos: 1,976
  #43
Old 25-04-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pygathrix View Post
ISIS currently lists 2.2 with 2 births in the past 12 months. Is this another ISIS mistake? The first baby was only born in August 2007 so this hardly seems possible. No mention of this on the zoo's website.
Strictly there were two youngsters born in August but one died. I would guess this is where ISIS gets 2 births. Not sure if they ever worked out whether the second cub was stillborn or died after birth, but its mentioned on the BBC:

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Twin's death mars rare panda joy
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 574
  #44
Old 25-04-2008

True, but that doesn't account for current standing of 2.2 instead if 2.1
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)