
03-03-2008
It is strange how culturally subjective our attitude to various taxon can become. It is inconcievable now for cetaceans to be housed in UK collections, but they can still be seen in France, Germany or the Netherlands, certainly not nations that are thought of as 'behind' the UK in terms of captive animal management. The public appetite for mammals in public aquaria has waned to the point that Brighton Sealife centre (formerly the aquarium that housed dolphins) had to abandon plans for a seal and otter pool last year due to public opposition. I wonder if it was because the collections here got it so wrong for so long, I mean we were left with Morecambe, Flamingoland (at the lowest point of the collection's decline), Brighton and Windsor in the end. Although I don't approve of cetaceans in captivity, I wonder if it would have all been different if Windsor hadn't procrastinated for so long about a new facility and had went ahead with something that more than met the guidelines?
With the exception (relatively speaking) of Windsor, could the loss of this taxonomic group in the British Isles be due to the shoddy list of their holdings over the last few decades? Most of the adult british public will have a killer whale/dolphin experience from their childhood that would make most think of their captivity as unjust. Morecambe, Dudley and Clacton especially come to mind.
|