
05-01-2011
Re Whipsnade - I do not think there is any justification for chaining Karishma during her birth. True, she does not have any related females in the herd there, but as far as I know she has bonded very well with Mya and Aziza, who are both very experienced with babys (Aziza being a 3-times-mother and Mya being the aunt for Aziza`s calves). If you look at experiences from other zoos, unrelated, experienced, bonded females do as well as midwifes then related ones.
Actually, Thi from Chester (killed the first calf and rejected the second) only raised her third calf, Sithami, because unrelated female Sheba was present during birth, supported Thi and teached her being a mother. Putting Karishma with Mya and Aziza for the birth may not have been risk-free, but the odds would have been good. Plus, it seems chaining females and restricting their movements so much can cause birth complications and even stillbirths. Unchained females have a lesser stillbirth rate and fewer rejections happen, I have seen a study about this.
Does anyone really know for sure that the 2 experienced females at Whipsnade are no longer chained for their births? I wouldn`t be so sure about this.
|