ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Europe > United Kingdom > London Zoo

Notices

giant pandas for London? » London Zoo

More from London Zoo: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Tigerlemurguy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hampshire, U.K
Posts: 1,246
Photos: 101
  #46
Old 25-10-2008

have giant pandas ever been mixed with other animals in captivity?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,624
Photos: 21
  #47
Old 25-10-2008

[quote=MARK;79520]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pertinax View Post

I would say that was the only time I have ever heard of a whole Gorilla troup being moved complete from zoo to zoo
Its the only instance of that ever happening and by far the largest transport of an established Gorilla group as well...over a record distance too.
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,092
  #48
Old 26-10-2008

[quote=MARK;79520]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pertinax View Post

I would say that was the only time I have ever heard of a whole Gorilla troup being moved complete from zoo to zoo, Taronga zoo did very well to get a breeding group as such , after all Gorllias dont grow on trees
It's actually not that unheard of. When a zoo is rebuliding there gorilla habitat. There troop may be moved together to another zoo temporarly.
Pertinax l am sure you would have the specifics for this.
__________________
Stuart R Webster
A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,092
  #49
Old 26-10-2008

Zooman ----"Okay CZJimmy! I am not intending to patronise you."


Quote:
Originally Posted by CZJimmy View Post
First off, don't patronise me. ZSL London Zoo isn't my home zoo or even my favourite.

Zooman---- "lets never let good be the enemy of the best" Just because they are a improvement does not make it a acceptable exhibit.

Regarding the exhibits, yes i was referring to the clore in there as they are a massive step up from their predecessors
Gorilla Kingdom > Sobell Pavillions
Clore Rainforest > Clore Pavillion
New bird house > old bird house
B.U.G.S. > bug house
Bear Mountain > Mappin Terraces
Into Africa > Cotton Terraces

I'd also like to understand why you think the Clore was "appalling"? Sure, it's not Lied Jungle or JungleWorld, but it was never intended to be on that scale...

Zooman---
The building is very unatractive.
You are not emersed in the exhibit at all.
The glass fronted marmoset enclosures around the sides are way to small.
I bet it cost a mint!!! It is already outdated. The stuffyness of the air while l was there in Febuary and March was horrible.
The main exhibit area was surronded on 3 sides by public viewing. I hate to think what it's like in there high season.

The Elephant and Rhino house is listed but the zoo didn't decide for it to be listed, so they're stuck with it. The zoo management at the time (and I stress "at the time") employed architects who seemed to consider the look of a building more than the animal's needs.



Not every zoo exhibit is perfect, ZSL did seem to follow a trend with the gorilla lawns (have a look at the number of them in the US) but has sought to rectify this, unlike a number of collections.

Zooman--- my point is "if" ZSL is so good why did it have to so dramaticly have to rectify soooo much.

I've never said ZSL is "so damn good". I said it was good at getting it's conservation message across and that it didn't deserve all the criticism it gets.



And this sentence could be said for every single zoo on the planet, not just London.
Zooman---- this quote was in the context of the insitu work you pointed out ZSL does unlike many other zoo's.

CZJimmy;79524 l am on this site as l enjoy reading others peoples thoughts and adding my own acosionaly. I am not here to patronise or antagonise any one just enjoy a healthy discussion.

Sim can yo add spell check ;]
__________________
Stuart R Webster
A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead
Tigerlemurguy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hampshire, U.K
Posts: 1,246
Photos: 101
  #50
Old 26-10-2008

this is getting a bit out of hand!
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,624
Photos: 21
  #51
Old 26-10-2008

It's actually not that unheard of. When a zoo is rebuliding there gorilla habitat. There troop may be moved together to another zoo temporarly.
Pertinax l am sure you would have the specifics for this.[/quote]

You are right to a degree. In recent years several zoos, mostly in the USA have moved groups(or several animals) as you said while accomodation is being rebuilt etc.

But none has ever repeated the scale or distance of the Apenheul to Sydney group transfer, which was both groundbreaking and 100% successful.

(I don't know how we got into this discussion on a Panda Thread, apologies to others for creating a 'double topic').

Last edited by MARK; 26-10-2008 at 05:02 AM.
glyn's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,868
Photos: 36
  #52
Old 27-10-2008

there seems to be a lot of critisicm directed at london zoo on this thread. one of the most unfair accussations in my opinion is that gorillas are simply there to make up a postage stamp collection.
give me a break. you are talking about a zoo that has one species of big ape, no elephants or bears, no rhino, river hippo; in short, the zoo keeps of the possible dozen or so species of charismatic mega-vertebrate a mere handful with just gorilla, tiger, lion and giraffe. this zoo's long-standing dedication to field conservation for not only gorillas but all those obscure little invertebrates we prefer to step on, in my opinion, elevates ZSL to leader.
as for design...i think it is fair to say that few zoos have such an interesting history as london zoo. the history of this institutions is as beset with acheivements as it is with failures. i think those who are quick to jump and attack london zoo are those who are least in the know of this places history...this place has been shaped directly by government, war, the monarchy, money...you name it this zoo has faced it and survived, though it emerged from the 70's coughing and spluttering. the last two decades have been particularly hard and its only since 2000 that the place has moved forward. and despite the short-falls of gorilla kingdom, weve all seen far worse enclosures in the gallery from zoos in the US which cost as much as three times the price-tag.
no to pandas....are these animals as really as exclusive as they used to be? yes, they are blockbuster exhibits, but as most aspects of their previously complicated reproductive behaviour have been ironed out, China has become somewhat of a panda mill and animals are going all over the place. its probably, in the next few years, about time to face facts. theyre essentially a critically endangered bear...very charismatic with tremendous appeal for conservation. if they are available, and zoos are willing, why not out-source captive-bred bears to other zoos.
just to wrap it all up, london zoo, at 36 acres, is small. but they arent planning on sticking elephants on the north bank or hippos in the listed penguin pool. they seem to have accepted their spatial limitations, and have adapted their collection and master-planning processes as such. fortunately, for the likes of amur leopards, british field crickets etc, this zoo doesnt just confine its work outside its gates to animals within them in an attempt to legitimise captivity. this zoo's motto 'every living thing is our concern' is truly apportriate.
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,875
Photos: 244
  #53
Old 27-10-2008

Very well said Glyn and true, some of you younger members should take note with the facts stated here
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Abbotsford, B.C., Canada
Posts: 5,408
Photos: 8,799
  #54
Old 27-10-2008

A well-written and staunch defence of London Zoo, and one that brings to light one fact that many people overlook. The lack of many physically large mammals has been a tremendous shift at the zoo over the past 30 years, and while the exhibit quality is perhaps not always there then at least Whipsnade has been able to flourish and maintain breeding herds of the larger species on the second site. It's always fantastic when zoos can have satellite organizations where animals can sometimes be shuffled back and forth between the two. San Diego, Taronga, Adelaide, Melbourne, etc, can all showcase hoofstock while their city counterparts can focus on smaller mammals.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Stockport, UK
Posts: 385
Photos: 67
  #55
Old 28-10-2008

The gorilla exhibit had some teething troubles but seems to be functioning better now (in terms of landscaping and the make up of the gorilla group).

I personally think that B.U.G.S. is one of the best exhibits in any UK zoo right now. It's innovative, houses a great range of small and unusual creatures, has great "interpretation" and gets across key conservation messages, is housed in an attractively designed building and best of all is always jam packed to the rafters.

And in terms of research, as Glyn rightly pointed out, ZSL are world leaders in this field.
Tigerlemurguy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hampshire, U.K
Posts: 1,246
Photos: 101
  #56
Old 28-10-2008

well said glyn, could you insert some paragraphs because my eyes hurt now! xD
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #57
Old 28-10-2008

Well said Glyn. I think me and you are firmly on the same page when it comes to this debate
Cat-Man's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,399
Photos: 27
  #58
Old 28-10-2008

well said glyn.
what i would like to see (all thought it is unlikly) london zoo to expand into regrents park, so lager species, such as elephants and rhino can come back. Then, much like San Diego zoo, could give Pandas there own little private area.
Larger animal could be included and also, large multie species exhibits with the adding of more animals and splitting the zoo into biome areas
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,624
Photos: 21
  #59
Old 28-10-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat-Man View Post
well said glyn.
what i would like to see (all thought it is unlikly) london zoo to expand into regrents park, so lager species, such as elephants and rhino can come back.
It will never happen on any scale. I believe the zoo does have an option to extend slightly if it ever wanted to along (I think) its Southern boundary but would only be a narrow strip amounting to a few acres.

Space problems in Regent's Park is one reason for the existence of Whipsnade.
Cat-Man's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: oxfordshire UK
Posts: 1,399
Photos: 27
  #60
Old 28-10-2008

its just a dream
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)