ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Europe > United Kingdom > London Zoo

Notices

London Zoo Notes. » London Zoo

More from London Zoo: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #16
Old 24-12-2007

Just to get back on topic - Does anyone know when 'Frog World is set to be completed?
kiang's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: oban, argyllshire
Posts: 1,828
Photos: 214
  #17
Old 09-01-2008

London zoo has announced the hatching of 2 Gila monster their first for 15 years hatched to animals from the closed Glasgow zoo.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Wales
Posts: 1,020
  #18
Old 10-01-2008

that's good news
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #19
Old 13-01-2008

London Zoo's website is inviting guests to come and see the new and improved otter pool...
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #20
Old 17-01-2008

Also according to the London Zoo site, there is a new Pygmy Hippo indoor heated pool...
NZ Jeremy's Avatar
Member
Online
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,146
Photos: 89
  #21
Old 17-01-2008

Hello my Britannia masters, I NZ Jeremy bid you hello from the COMMONwealth..!

(j/k)

I had a look at the London Zoo map today and for lack of a better term it looked a little "higgilty piggilty"...

Are there any plans for a geographical or biome focused structure to exhibits, a master plan if you will..?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East Yorkshire UK
Posts: 629
Photos: 135
  #22
Old 17-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZ Jeremy View Post
Hello my Britannia masters, I NZ Jeremy bid you hello from the COMMONwealth..!

(j/k)

I had a look at the London Zoo map today and for lack of a better term it looked a little "higgilty piggilty"...

Are there any plans for a geographical or biome focused structure to exhibits, a master plan if you will..?
I think it'd be very hard for London to do, they have enough trouble working with the limited space and the listed buildings as it is, without having to stick to some greater structure. There is beginning to be some evidence of moving away from taxanomic displays towards geographical ones i.e. The Into Africa area has mostly savanna animals whilst the The Gorilla Kingdom has all African rainforest animals. However these two african areas, which are both pretty new, are not located close to one another, and there are South American areas distributed in between. I guess there are localised areas of geographically planned exhibits, which do not fit to any overall masterplan.
NZ Jeremy's Avatar
Member
Online
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,146
Photos: 89
  #23
Old 17-01-2008

I may seem overly critical but I grew up with stories of London being "the zoo", the first, 1828 etc... Its always sad when reality outpaces youth...
glyn's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,868
Photos: 36
  #24
Old 17-01-2008

in many respects London Zoo really is still 'the zoo' setting benchmarks. particularly when it comes to the work of the zoo, beyond the zoo! its portfolio of in-situ work is amazing. much of the time people patronize london zoo when in fact the work carried out there drives the future of zoos the world over, past present and future.
Supporter
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Abbotsford, B.C., Canada
Posts: 5,408
Photos: 8,799
  #25
Old 18-01-2008

Interesting to see that London Zoo's planning is being examined critically, as indeed its exhibits are literally all over the map. But the San Diego Zoo also does not adhere to the geographic/biome/biosphere master plan to exhibit animals, and like London it might be too late to adopt such a strategy. It appears that the future of zoos, and the majority of the top zoos already are under such planning, is to continue to exhibit animals geographically.
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #26
Old 18-01-2008

The problem I see with London's layout is that they had spent decades building exhibits taxonomically. The casson pavillion (pachyderms), Lion house and subsequent terraces (cats), mappin terraces (bears) and so forth are clear examples.

This has left them in the position that is hard to get out of...
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 20
  #27
Old 18-01-2008

Really, though, geographic representation is already out of date, as biome-based exhibits seem to be on the up lately.....

the two african areas could easily be linked via the tunnel to the current malayan tapir area from gorilla kingdom and the african bird safari....
CZJimmy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 2,427
Photos: 423
  #28
Old 18-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by londoner View Post

the two african areas could easily be linked via the tunnel to the current malayan tapir area from gorilla kingdom and the african bird safari....
not to mention the pygmy hippos during the summer months...

Now, the mappins need to "africanised" to complete that section.
NZ Jeremy's Avatar
Member
Online
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,146
Photos: 89
  #29
Old 18-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by londoner View Post
Really, though, geographic representation is already out of date, as biome-based exhibits seem to be on the up lately.....
I personally find geographical and biome based the best... I.e. African Rainforest etc...
Maguari's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 413
Photos: 2,073
  #30
Old 18-01-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by CZJimmy View Post
The problem I see with London's layout is that they had spent decades building exhibits taxonomically. The casson pavillion (pachyderms), Lion house and subsequent terraces (cats), mappin terraces (bears) and so forth are clear examples.

This has left them in the position that is hard to get out of...
To be honest, I'd prefer they didn't try to get out of it too much. The site isn't large enough for decent-sized themed displays; something the size of Into Africa is about as large as an individual area could go without taking over the place.

Besides, where would the fun be if every zoo were arranged in exactly the same way? Most of the current zoo Master Plans look unnervingly similar. Obviously, if you're going to do major rebuilding then it's worth having some kind of logic to what you're doing, but I wish someone would take a bit of a different tack. Actually, someone is, with Dudley's plans to exploit the history of the site by creating a zoo zoned not just by location but also by time and science, complete with the story of exploration of the world through the major animal zones, a mediaeval farmyard in the Castle keep and the story of Darwin, Wallace and natural selection through a refreshingly taxonomic ape area.
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)