
18-01-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by CZJimmy
The problem I see with London's layout is that they had spent decades building exhibits taxonomically. The casson pavillion (pachyderms), Lion house and subsequent terraces (cats), mappin terraces (bears) and so forth are clear examples.
This has left them in the position that is hard to get out of...
|
To be honest, I'd prefer they didn't try to get out of it too much. The site isn't large enough for decent-sized themed displays; something the size of Into Africa is about as large as an individual area could go without taking over the place.
Besides, where would the fun be if every zoo were arranged in exactly the same way? Most of the current zoo Master Plans look unnervingly similar. Obviously, if you're going to do major rebuilding then it's worth having some kind of logic to what you're doing, but I wish someone would take a bit of a different tack. Actually, someone is, with Dudley's plans to exploit the history of the site by creating a zoo zoned not just by location but also by time and science, complete with the story of exploration of the world through the major animal zones, a mediaeval farmyard in the Castle keep and the story of Darwin, Wallace and natural selection through a refreshingly taxonomic ape area.
|