
30-11-2007
oh I'm sure it would be most inconvenient for them to take on another bachelor group, but still feasible, and overall the trust running the four collections has a responsibility to its animals. I just think if there had been the will, they could have integrated a couple of non-breeding females and created two groups. I don't believe they approached any primate sanctuaries and defended this by suggesting an establishment that doesn't already keep this species would not solve the welfare issues they faced, but given that these were castrated males which had no longer accepted a bachelor situation were they really surprised when all the european zoos holding sulawesi macaques refused to rehome these individuals? Those zoos would have had to undertake the task of setting up an extra, non-breeding group by integrating one or two non-breeding or overrepresented females with the Newquay males, a task which I think is really the responsibility of the Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust and the collections it runs. I think the zoo could not be seen to have to send its animals to a sanctuary. And now the male they kept is to start a breeding group with some females arriving imminently.
|