ZooChat
 
Go Back   ZooChat > Europe > United Kingdom > South Lakes Wild Animal Park

Notices

South Lakes » South Lakes Wild Animal Park

More from South Lakes Wild Animal Park: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Posts: 1,780
  #1
South Lakes
Old 06-10-2007

[quote=zoogiraffe;23544]As some one who has visitied the place at least once a year for the last 6 years,i wouldn`t say it was a damn fine zoo,differnt yes but fine no.the raised walk way that he put in to me has spoilt the zoo completly [quote]

I have not been there, so perhaps any comment is unfair. However, I have watched the developments at South Lakes and know others who do visit quite regularly. It seems to have developed very rapidly(too rapidly?) over the years without an awful lot of care going into the building work. Is it a 'jerry-built' zoo? I 've seen photos of some of the paddocks too which look very bare from overuse.

The website trumpets breeding successes and conservation projects in a way that implies-we're the best, other zoos are .... [quote]

I copied this out from another forum.

It seems - I have only seen the website so far - that exhibits are not as well thought out as it is made out to be on the website.

People seem to have strong opinions on the owner David Gill.

So, let us start ...!
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Wales
Posts: 1,020
  #2
Old 06-10-2007

The website i think does give an impression of a better zoo than it really is, the walkways do really spoil things a little bit. However they do have a great marsupial collection and the mixing of Hippos with Mandrills is interessting
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Stockport, UK
Posts: 385
Photos: 67
  #3
Old 06-10-2007

I've not been to the place even though I go to the Lakes quite a lot (mostly the north end around Keswick). It's quite remote from anywhere unless you're staying in the Barrow or Kendal area.

The website immediately strikes me as being a bit 'unprofessional' and some of the mixed exhibits sound strange. I think the planning of the zoo expansion has also been badly thought out (witness the debacle over the car park which was expanded without planning permission, igniting a long-running battle with the local council which Mr Gill finally won last week).

However there certainly appears to be a commitment to conservation. I think I'm right in saying Mr Gill is the EEP studbook holder for several of his marsupial species, and the tiger projects they are funding in Sumatra are very commendable. I would be interested to see the accounts - I bet they plough a lot more money into in-situ conservation than some of the more 'respected' zoos (but then again it always helps if your owner is a multi-millionaire to begin with!)
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #4
Old 06-10-2007

jst go read a forum about the zoo he started here in his native australia, and u will form opinions very quickly- mareeba wild animal park
Chlidonias's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 1,642
Photos: 504
  #5
Old 06-10-2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZooMania View Post
The website i think does give an impression of a better zoo than it really is, the walkways do really spoil things a little bit. However they do have a great marsupial collection and the mixing of Hippos with Mandrills is interessting
the photo on the website of the hippo with mandrills was certainly an interesting one, and he obviously has a lot of macropods which is good
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Posts: 1,780
  #6
Old 06-10-2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoo_Boy View Post
jst go read a forum about the zoo he started here in his native australia, and u will form opinions very quickly- mareeba wild animal park
Zooboy,

I know the story, but what is actually the latest on the inquiry into the Mareeba debacle? Has it been formalised? Is someone or are multiple individuals held accountable for what went wrong?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Stockport, UK
Posts: 385
Photos: 67
  #7
Old 06-10-2007

South Lakes remains one of the few large zoos in the UK that is not a member of BIAZA. It is a member of EAZA though.
zoogiraffe's Avatar
Member
Online
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Middlewich,Cheshire U.K
Posts: 1,684
Photos: 375
  #8
Old 06-10-2007

They used to be a BIAZA member but i think they left under a bit of a cloud around the time the rhino got out and had to be shot the main road,they re-applied to join in 2005 or2006 and were turned down.The park has some very good ideas and the animals are in very good condition but they seem to have more than their fair share of problems.I have meet and spoken to David Gill a few times and have always found him to be very talkative person who has very strong opinion of whats right and wrong,within the zoo world.
Chlidonias's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 1,642
Photos: 504
  #9
Old 06-10-2007

3 big hippos...7 hippos total (5 pigmies and 3 commons)

Lol, as Zoo Boy says below, 5+3 actually does equal 8. I should have noticed that too!

Last edited by Chlidonias; 07-10-2007 at 06:11 AM. Reason: I'm a dumbass
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,203
  #10
Old 06-10-2007

3 big hippos actually equals 8 lol my bad!
kiang's Avatar
Member
Online
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: oban, argyllshire
Posts: 1,828
Photos: 214
  #11
Old 06-10-2007

which zoos could do with them most?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 6,620
Photos: 21
  #12
Old 06-10-2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoogiraffe View Post
The park has some very good ideas and the animals are in very good condition but they seem to have more than their fair share of problems.
Like someone trying to murder the owner....

Does anyone know yet if that was a simple 'breakin' or did the perpetrator have other agenda?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Posts: 1,780
  #13
Old 06-10-2007

Does South Lakes have a masterplanning? What is it destined to house in future? Which new species? Does the zoo have more park exhibits or is it more biotope range? How are the enclosures sited in the landscape?
taun's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,357
Photos: 230
  #14
Old 07-10-2007

I went to south lakes a year or two back, while yes it is a very different zoo experince i would not class it has one of the UK's bigs zoo's. if you ask me it feels very much like he went to Ikea and bought a flat pack zoo and put it together badly!
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 770
Photos: 59
  #15
Old 07-10-2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by taun View Post
if you ask me it feels very much like he went to Ikea and bought a flat pack zoo and put it together badly!
Many people wish he'd gone to that much trouble with his failed attempt in Queensland! Much more would have been better of course. Still, he's as far away from here as can be now, that's the main thing
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)