
21-05-2009
Thanks Snowleopard, it makes very sobering and disturbing reading.
I'm assuming, that in the absence of any further specific threads since 2008, that there has been no improvement ? (or maybe better still, closure)
I also went on to their website ...... which I found equally disturbing in far too many respects to list here, but which includes repeated claims of caring for the animals, giving them a better life etc (which is in direct contrast to the photos posted here, and the various reports), and photos (mostly headshots) which showed nothing of the nasty enclosures. I also found (as a parent) a very creepy note about not worrying if your child disappears, as they are apparently 'drawn to him' and he 'loves children'. Leaving aside the animal issues for a second, I find that an astonishing 'selling point' for any 'attraction' to make an issue of.
The place claims to be a 'sanctuary'. As far as I'm concerned, it is never enough to justify appalling conditions by saying the animal would have otherwise been put down. Sometimes you have to make a hard judgement call and ask if the quality of life you can offer the animal is, at the least, an adequate one. If, on the other hand, (even with the best of intentions) your best efforts would mean the animal suffering either mentally or physically, then you shouldn't take it on. There are all sorts of pets I would love to have but I can't provide their basic needs (which is more than food) so I don't have them, simple as. In my opinion, people who claim to have an interest in, and love for, animals but who keep them in such disgusting conditions are lying hypocrites (and / or must be incredibly stupid).
Last edited by GillP; 21-05-2009 at 05:52 AM.
|