Join our zoo community

Are there still Tasmanian tigers.....on New Guinea ?

Discussion in 'Wildlife & Nature Conservation' started by vogelcommando, 22 May 2013.

  1. SwampDonkey

    SwampDonkey In the Swamp Premium Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2017
    Posts:
    2,034
    Location:
    .
    Personally I think they are still out there. Whether in Tasmania, the mainland or New Guinea I am not qualified to say. Reports that I have read and seen seem to indicate New Guinea and the Cape York peninsula are the most "likely" of the non-Tasmanian locations.
     
    Wisp O' Mist likes this.
  2. Chlidonias

    Chlidonias Moderator Staff Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    13 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    23,442
    Location:
    New Zealand
    I just watched through that video. He has a curious attitude of "I know it exists" but keeps swapping where he believes it exists so it is literally just a wish and not on evidence. He thought Tasmania and didn't find any on his one attempt so now doesn't think it is in Tasmania, and then same for mainland Australia, so now he "knows" it must exist in New Guinea.

    Because he is just sitting there talking it is difficult to know how much of what he is saying is "accurate" and how much is mis-speaking, but I haven't heard of Nick Mooney seeing living thylacines before, especially two at once - if Nick actually is saying that then it must have either been a very recent sighting or he has suddenly decided to reveal some old event which would be curious. (It is also weird that Forrest apparently now doesn't think thylacines survive in Tasmania [because he didn't find them], even though he was there with Nick Mooney who, according to this, had a conclusive sighting in Tasmania on some previous occasion).

    The story from Cape York of four thylacines playing with the guy's dog is just nonsense.

    The New Guinea bit is really interesting, but my credibility broke when the scientist studying singing dogs, who he enlisted to survey for thylacine sightings, found a jaw bone of what was supposed to be a thylacine and took one photo of it - didn't take the jawbone itself, didn't take a tooth, didn't take more than one photo. For a scientist this is simply unbelievable. Then the caption on the screen reads "the actual picture is being safeguarded by a variety of trusted experts at this time". And then he says he needs five million dollars to mount an expedition to go to this undisclosed place and set up camera traps.
     
  3. Chlidonias

    Chlidonias Moderator Staff Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    13 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    23,442
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Why do think "they are still out there" if you can't even say which of those three very different locations are where they still exist?
     
  4. JVM

    JVM Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    1 Nov 2013
    Posts:
    1,567
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Those are some great points, Chili, but... hold on?

    Bolded for emphasis. That's what this is. It's grift.
     
    Fallax and ThylacineAlive like this.
  5. Pertinax

    Pertinax Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    20,793
    Location:
    england
    Apart from the implausability of some of his claims( 'sadly' the jawbone wasn't collected....:rolleyes:), this guy just does not do his research accurately at all. The quote about Nick Mooney has since been found entirely wrong, it wasn't Nick Mooney at all. Gallante's 'evidence' and quotes are riddled with such innaccuracies I'm afraid. Very misleading to anyone who believes it- serious Thylacine researchers don't.
     
    Strathmorezoo and Osedax like this.