A California man was caught trying to smuggle arapaima into the U.S. for the pet trade. Apparently there are a lot of rich aquarists who want arapaima - really? Now he is going to prison. L.A.'s Stupidest Smuggler Faces 10 Years in Prison Today after Getting Interpol on HIs Fishy Case | L.A. Weekly
Interesting case, although I could live without the low-brow commentary style of L.A. Weekly. Do hobby aquarists really have tanks big enough for arapaima?
There's an Arapaima facility on the east coast. They're raised for food and aquarists. Some aquarists go all out, adding huge tanks in their homes. 50,000 gallon tanks or larger, aren't that uncommon. Aquarists go all-out.
So if captive raised specimens can be legally obtained from this east coast facility, why would aquarists purchase illegally imported specimens from this guy? Are they cheaper?
Demand. Making a market for these fish to be obtained at any cost. The smuggler had an agenda and got busted. Who knows where those fish would end up. I don't follow pricing of these guys, but I'm sure smaller ones are less expensive than ones over 1m. The farm doesn't sell to "Joe Public Pet Shops". People with crazy ideas of obtaining them can't just go to a pet store and get some that outgrow their tank.
According to the Tennessee Aquarium, trade is "heavily regulated". The article also says they're protected, but doesn't go into specifics. (and apparently all of the arapaima at this aquarium were obtained from confiscations, so I guess arapaima smuggling is more than just this one guy) And according to these other articles, he's been charged for importing all sorts of species, not just arapaima. Also, falsifying documents, among other things. U.S. seeks San Fernando Valley man charged with smuggling piranhas | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles Times Courthouse News Service Fish Smuggler Pleads Guilty to Smuggling Two Arapaima gigas Alleged fish smuggler sought by authorities | News | Practical Fishkeeping The last article says that owning arapaima is illegal in California, but I can't find another source that says it. This page is a list of restricted species in California, but I don't see arapaima on the list. I'm guessing that, even if owning the fish is legal, maybe they require some kind of permit to import. (or at least, there are certain regulations that must be followed) Buyers might not have known that the fish were obtained illegally, and even if they did, they might not care if his fish are cheaper or easier to get.
this was back in 2009 and 2010, before the splits. The article in David's original post was horribly-written; it reads as if it was handed in by a teenager as a homework assignment. There's a more informative one here - Ex-West Hills Resident Pleads Guilty to Fish Trafficking Charge | NBC Southern California - including additional information to what was in the links in TheMightyOrca's post (and also some pricing for the arapaima he was selling).