Join our zoo community

Jersey is not part of the UK

Discussion in 'ZooChat Community & Website' started by Andrew Swales, 12 May 2020.

  1. Andrew Swales

    Andrew Swales Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2018
    Posts:
    1,743
    Location:
    none
    Last edited by a moderator: 14 May 2020
  2. polarbear

    polarbear Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    6 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    169
    Location:
    Devon, UK
    Jersey is a self-governing dependency of the United Kingdom
     
  3. Andrew Swales

    Andrew Swales Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2018
    Posts:
    1,743
    Location:
    none
  4. Cat-Man

    Cat-Man Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    6 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    3,002
    Location:
    GBR
    It is honestly not worth the hassle at all.
     
    pipaluk, SHAVINGTONZOO and TNT like this.
  5. Andrew Swales

    Andrew Swales Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2018
    Posts:
    1,743
    Location:
    none
    Quite - some posters though, were being very particular about the constitutional status....
     
    pipaluk and SHAVINGTONZOO like this.
  6. MRJ

    MRJ Well-Known Member 15+ year member Premium Member

    Joined:
    29 Jan 2008
    Posts:
    2,529
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I guess that comment refers to me.

    I brought up Jersey's constitutional status to explain why Jersey Zoo was operating under different rules to zoos located in the UK and I believe that was pertinent to the discussion at hand. That people were ignorant of Jersey's status does not surprise me, I am sure Jersey Constitutional Law is not a subject in British schools. I only know because I have an interest in such oddities.

    If we were running a list on politics or constitutional law, of course Jersey should be in it's own category. However this is a zoo list, and the important thing is that people can quickly find threads for zoos they are interested in. I think almost all people would try to find Jersey Zoo under the United Kingdom. For that reason I think it would be best to leave it where it is.
     
    TNT and Simon Hampel like this.
  7. Andrew Swales

    Andrew Swales Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2018
    Posts:
    1,743
    Location:
    none
    I did say posters, and not poster..
    Where one persons 'near enough is good enough' stops - and another persons objection to 'offensive' lack of detail - will always be up for debate...
     
    Last edited: 14 May 2020
  8. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,035
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I make the decisions about groupings and MRJ is completely correct - this was done for purely functional purposes and not based on political or legal grounds.
     
    TNT, Antoine, Fallax and 1 other person like this.