Many people have asked this question and as yet have received no answer from NASA or any other organisation close to or part of outside organisations of NASA, I am still a little confused as to why this as never been answered but here goes as I know some people on here are more clued up than myself on the moon landing's. Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon or was he and if he wasn't who was by this the question is. Who put the camera on the moon surface to take the pictures of the moon landing and the first steps on the moon. Please remember that in the past organisations have stated no robotic engineering's were used in any form on any part of the moon landings. Just another quick one we all saw the pictures of the moon landing site in virtually perfect condition then why didn't they also show the tracks from the experiments they took when asked the answer was a definite they were lost to moon dust which I can believe no problem but if the others were lost then why wasn't the moon landing site damaged by moon dust. Not a sign anywhere of any damage of dust funny that is?
I'm sure there are a multitude of other websites (choose the echo chamber that suits you best) that are far better suited and more accommodating for these types of "enquiries"?
OK, hands up, you've caught all us believers out -you can stop posting on this now and go to bed knowing you're right and you've convinced us we were all wrong. What idiots we were.
You lucky person, I consider it the greatest achievement by mankind in my lifetime though I was too young to be aware it was happening. On a bad day, and a few beers, I'll argue it's all been downhill since Armstrong stepped on the moon. If anyone's interested, and not already aware of it, there's a great book Moon Dust (Andrew Smith) where the author attempts to track down and interview all the surviving men who went to the moon. But unfortunately it's all part of the exercise to hoodwink us.
What I want to know is why all the Swiss cheese in the surface didn't melt when the Eagle landed. It must have still been hot from burning all that rocket fuel.
Next question from Adrian will be why hasn't anyone been back? My theory is that there was sod all there so they didn't bother going back. How much moon rock do you need really?
this thread is pretty much just a continuation of this other thread of Adrian's - Nessie - which jumped from a photo of some seals (erm, I mean Nessie) to the "fake moon landing" to NASA scientists just plain making things up. For Adrian, yes the moon landing was real. If you go on a forum of normal sensible people and ask if it's fake everyone will say "of course it's not fake, there is actual evidence to prove it". If you go on a forum of, how shall I put it, "fringe beliefs", then they will say "of course it's fake, everything the government says and does is fake, duh". Here's what you do. You go onto some actual scientific websites and read. Or, you know, just believe what you want to believe. It's not going to affect the world if you believe that everything is a lie - but your understanding of the world will be a lot poorer for it.
