Join our zoo community

Official thylacine bounty records

Discussion in 'General Zoo Discussion' started by Surroundx, 4 Oct 2010.

Tags:
  1. Surroundx

    Surroundx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    533
    Location:
    Two Rocks, West Australia
    I was wondering if anybody knows the number of thylacines killed and handed into officials during the 1888-1909 bounty, on a year by year basis. I know that a total of 2184 were killed over the entire period, as well as the numbers for the years 1888, 1908 and 1909.
     
  2. Devi

    Devi Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    27 Oct 2009
    Posts:
    452
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Off topic, but can you give a little background to the bounty? Why was it done? Surely by 1909 they must have been endangered?
     
  3. condor

    condor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    485
    Location:
    Nebel.
    The whole idea behind the bounty was to get rid of them. They were considered a menace by farmers and that was enough. Conservation has only gained widespread recognition in recent decades. Before that only a minority cared about saving animals from extinction. One thing was that many had a fundamental Christian view where animals were made for us by God but even more important are level of education and daily surplus to think about other things than getting enough food for ourself and our family. It is difficult to judge people of a different era by current standards.
     
  4. Pertinax

    Pertinax Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    20,775
    Location:
    england
    From Guiler. 1961. reproduced in 'The Tragedy of the Tasmanian Tiger'

    1888-81
    1889-113
    1890-128
    1891-90
    1892-112
    1893-107
    1894-105
    1895-109
    1896-121
    1897-120
    1898-108
    1899-143
    1900-153
    1901-151
    1902-119
    1903-96
    1904-98
    1905-111
    1906-58
    1907-42
    1908-17
    1909-2

    Total; 2184 (2040 adults. 144 juveniles)
    The scheme ran for three more years until 1912, but no more animals were presented in those years.
     
  5. Kifaru Bwana

    Kifaru Bwana Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    25 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    12,369
    Location:
    Amsterdam, Holland
    A real sad story and poignant too (to the point how careless us humans have been over biodiversity).

    It would seem that at the time of the extermination process the Tassie wolf was never common given those low numbers of kills ... :(
     
  6. Sid the gos

    Sid the gos Member

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    15
    Location:
    Atherton Queensland
    There is a terrific book by Robert Paddle (History and Extinction of the Tasmainian Tiger). It's a must read, I loved it!!
     
  7. Surroundx

    Surroundx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    533
    Location:
    Two Rocks, West Australia
    Thanks for that Pertinax! Much appreciated.
     
  8. Pertinax

    Pertinax Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    20,775
    Location:
    england
    I think that's a pretty big number of kills for an Apex predator which is obviously going to be less numerous than the prey species that support it.

    All the literature suggests there was a population crash around the time the Bounty scheme ended, but whether it was caused by the effect of the Bounty scheme, or other causes, will never be known now.
     
  9. DDcorvus

    DDcorvus Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    1,303
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    If you read Guiler and Paddle, both of them note that there are strong indications that a disease with similar symptoms as canine distemper was raging through the thylacine population during the bounty scheme (there are similar indications that the tasmanian devil and spotted quoll populations populations crashed end of the 19th century/early 20th).
     
  10. Pertinax

    Pertinax Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    20,775
    Location:
    england
    I think they suggest that a disease like that COULD have been responsible for the crash in numbers.
     
  11. DDcorvus

    DDcorvus Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    1,303
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    this is what i wrote, didn't I :) sorry if this was not clear.
     
  12. Pertinax

    Pertinax Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    20,775
    Location:
    england
    yes you did. I just read it as sounding more certain than it really was. I think they hypothetised rather than having any hard evidence, but I mustn't be picky...:(