Join our zoo community

Reminder - photo guidelines

Discussion in 'ZooChat Community & Website' started by Arizona Docent, 24 May 2017.

  1. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    To be fair though - some galleries have tens of thousands of photos in them. In those cases it can be quite impractical to have a thorough knowledge of the existing content (although you could almost assume that every angle has already been covered anyway :eek: )

    This is a "guideline" rather than a "rule" - we encourage you to avoid duplication, but we recognise that sometimes it is going to happen.

    We may take a slightly different approach to these guidelines once we launch the new version of the site - I won't go into details yet as this is still to be finalised and depends on how I go with developing the new version.
     
    birdsandbats likes this.
  2. Arizona Docent

    Arizona Docent Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    10 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    7,702
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    IMPORTANT ADDITION: If you have photos from an established zoo that is not listed on ZooChat yet, please have that facility added and upload them there instead of just posting them in "other" under the general country index.

    You can have a facility added by going to the main header "ZooChat Website Help & Feedback" (the same main header this thread is in) and then look for "New Gallery Request Thread 2018" (or 2019 or 2020 or whatever year it happens to be). Just type a reply saying please add Zoo X (whatever the facility name is) under Costa Rica (or whatever country it is in). It could take either a few days or a couple weeks for it to be added, but you should get an email notification when Jobalba adds it to the thread. It is also helpful (but not mandatory) in your request to include a link to the facility website if they have a website.

    I am posting this reminder because I just spent a good amount of time moving three dozen photos from the "other" category of a major African country to the newly created listing (which I asked to be created). The "other" listing is for places that are too small to have a separate listing, like a pet shop or a hotel animal exhibit or similar. Any established zoo or aquarium that you visit needs to have a separate listing.
     
    TinoPup likes this.
  3. birdsandbats

    birdsandbats Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2017
    Posts:
    11,359
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    It's not just South Africa. In my opinion, the 'other' galleries for all the countries should be sorted through.
     
  4. Chlidonias

    Chlidonias Moderator Staff Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    13 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    23,400
    Location:
    New Zealand
    You've just nomnated yourself to do that job then.
     
    m30t likes this.
  5. birdsandbats

    birdsandbats Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2017
    Posts:
    11,359
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I never said it had to be one person.
     
  6. Arizona Docent

    Arizona Docent Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    10 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    7,702
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    We (the moderators) take care of these kind of issues as we come across them. In this specific case someone visited a major wildlife park and uploaded several photos in "other" and had the facility name in the caption. I happened to notice it because the photos were at the top of the new media page when I looked at it. You (plural "you" as in the members) can help us by reporting these as you find them. One or two photos are probably not worth the trouble, but if you see several photos from an established zoo (posted in "other") please click report on any one of them (NOT all of them) and we will get to it.
     
  7. Hvedekorn

    Hvedekorn Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    597
    Location:
    Skive, Denmark
    I've recently added some photos from various Danish "deer gardens" ("dyrehaver"), and I purposely added them to the Danish "other" gallery. I did this because that while they may be interesting enough to share and are technically zoological institutions, I thought their scope was too limited to deserve their own galleries (only one or two species at each place, and I only uploaded maybe five photos for each).

    Was this wrong? Should I have asked for separate galleries for each of them even though I would only upload five or so photos?
     
  8. Arizona Docent

    Arizona Docent Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    10 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    7,702
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    If they are generalized attractions with only one or two animal species, I don't think they need their own listings. It sounds like you did the correct thing.
     
    Hvedekorn likes this.
  9. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    It's been over 12 months since this thread was last updated, so I'm going to bump it again to remind all of our users about what we expect for the photo gallery.
     
  10. Flyer.Nick

    Flyer.Nick Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    4 Sep 2018
    Posts:
    10
    Location:
    Scranton / Zlin
    Hi, how is it about watermark on photos and "art" photos? Is it acceptable in Media section, or just plain photos? (of course I mean photos of animals or exhibits from zoo)
     
  11. TeaLovingDave

    TeaLovingDave Moderator Staff Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Posts:
    14,735
    Location:
    Wilds of Northumberland
    Funnily enough this is an issue we have been discussing of late, and hope to clarify soon :) but broadly speaking watermarks are fine as long as they don't overwhelm the image or advertise outside websites.
     
  12. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I'll go one step further than @TeaLovingDave and specify that watermarks should be subtle and not detract from the image.

    Once we're ready to publish our guidelines, I'll include some examples for reference - but for now, I suggest you proceed with a few uploads and we'll let you know if we think there's an issue. If you like, you could report one of your own photos and ask for confirmation - we'll let you know if they are okay.
     
  13. TeaLovingDave

    TeaLovingDave Moderator Staff Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Posts:
    14,735
    Location:
    Wilds of Northumberland
    Yeah, that's basically what I meant to convey with "as long as they don't overwhelm the image" :)
     
  14. Shirokuma

    Shirokuma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,079
    Location:
    .
    I reported a few basically duplicate pictures just now. I am happy to be more thorough in this as I have quite a lot of time at the moment, if that is helpful of course.
     
    Chlidonias likes this.
  15. TinoPup

    TinoPup Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2016
    Posts:
    6,553
    Location:
    .
    Just want to confirm that photos on the forum, not in the media gallery, must also be taken by the user making the post or from within zoochat (with a link, using the bb code). There's been several newer users posting photos from off forum lately.
     
  16. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I don't have a problem with people using photos from other sites in their forum posts - provided that they give attribution to the source.

    If you do see photos that are not from ZooChat and don't include attribution, please report them.
     
    birdsandbats and TinoPup like this.
  17. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Just to clarify my previous post:

    Images owned by professional photographers or hosted by commercial photograph licensing services (eg Getty Images) should never be posted on ZooChat.

    Services like Getty Images have automated bots that search the internet for people using their photographs without a license - and they will send their lawyers after you with a bill if they find you doing so.

    Attribution is not just a link to the jpg or png file - it means linking to the actual location you found the image online. If you can't provide attribution, you should not use the photo.

    Google images or similar search engines are not acceptable sources - and neither is a photo sharing site where people share copyrighted images. It must be the original source of the image.

    Pinterest is not an acceptable source and images found on Pinterest should not be posted on ZooChat unless you can locate the original source and attribute that.

    Photos you downloaded at some point in the past should not be uploaded as an attachment, unless you can locate the original source and give attribution.

    It doesn't matter if you have been given permission from the copyright holder of the image to use it - I would also require written permission given explicitly to ZooChat to publish the photo, directly from the copyright holder.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 24 Oct 2021
    TinoPup likes this.
  18. TinoPup

    TinoPup Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Jul 2016
    Posts:
    6,553
    Location:
    .
    Can you clarify what you mean by "professional photographer"?
     
  19. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Administrator Staff Member 20+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Oct 2003
    Posts:
    4,026
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Someone who makes their living by taking and selling photographs.
     
  20. cloudedleopard611

    cloudedleopard611 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7 Jun 2022
    Posts:
    411
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Would photos of visitors feeding animals where you can't see any identifying features fall under this exception?