Join our zoo community

ZooChat Cup Group D2: Plzen vs San Diego

Discussion in 'ZooChat Cup' started by CGSwans, 16 Dec 2019.

?

Plzen vs San Diego: Asia

Poll closed 18 Dec 2019.
  1. Plzen 3-0 San Diego

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Plzen 2-1 San Diego

    37.1%
  3. San Diego 2-1 Plzen

    60.0%
  4. San Diego 3-0 Plzen

    2.9%
  1. Coelacanth18

    Coelacanth18 Well-Known Member Premium Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2015
    Posts:
    3,706
    Location:
    California
    Perhaps, although personally I think extrapolating a topic as general as admission price to an Asian-specific comparison is a much bigger stretch than your comparison, TLD. I brought it up partially to show what mechanism allows San Diego to spend so much on conservation and research (charging exorbitant ticket prices) and partially because of my own personal annoyance at said exorbitant prices :p
     
    ThylacineAlive likes this.
  2. TeaLovingDave

    TeaLovingDave Moderator Staff Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Posts:
    14,735
    Location:
    Wilds of Northumberland
    Not really; a collection with a much smaller budget does have to pick and choose where to develop and cultivate strengths more than one with a vast amount of cashflow does.
     
    pipaluk and ThylacineAlive like this.
  3. birdsandbats

    birdsandbats Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2017
    Posts:
    11,354
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    @Haasje I would be interested to know why you voted 3-0 for San Diego?
     
  4. ThylacineAlive

    ThylacineAlive Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    10,699
    Location:
    Connecticut, U.S.A.
    I asked them that earlier on.

    Personally I'd say 3-0 is a bit extreme given the arguments made on both sides but to each their own.

    ~Thylo
     
    pipaluk likes this.
  5. TZDugong

    TZDugong Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Nov 2017
    Posts:
    1,121
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    I'm not sure I entirely agree with this comparison. Taronga had the geographic advantage of being situated in Australia, while Chester is quite far away from where most Island species are. In this case San Diego isn't particularly close to Asia, while Plzen is closer toAsia, which gives them the geographic advantage.

    Of course San Diego has much more money, but Plzen has a very comprehensive collection, and I believe more Asian species than San Diego.

    I'd also argue that San Diego has had to work harder to design some of their enclosures, while in a lot of cases Plzen's exhibits seem to be putting a fence around natural woodland (not saying this is bad, but it's easier to do).
     
    amur leopard likes this.
  6. TZDugong

    TZDugong Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Nov 2017
    Posts:
    1,121
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    If EEHV is already in both African and Asian Elephants, then why would it be a problem to hold them together? Obviously they should never have been put together in the first place, but now that the damage is done, what difference would it make to have Asians and Africans together. If all-African herds and all-Asian herds both can have EEHV, then surely there's no problem mixing the two?
     
    amur leopard likes this.
  7. amur leopard

    amur leopard Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2019
    Posts:
    4,144
    Location:
    London
    Realistically, if EEHV is found in the same concentrations are African and Asian elephants which seems to be the case, this mix gives exactly the same chance of getting the virus as 4 Asian or 4 African elephants, and even more if the herd is increased in number.
     
  8. TZDugong

    TZDugong Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    17 Nov 2017
    Posts:
    1,121
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    That's what I was thinking about as well.
     
    amur leopard likes this.
  9. Great Argus

    Great Argus Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    30 Mar 2018
    Posts:
    5,442
    Location:
    California
    The main problem stems from Africans being the transfer to Asians, which are far more susceptible. The loss of numerous Asian calves is the main difficulty at present. This is why the two are now recommended to be kept separate. Given that San Diego Zoo's are all female and past their prime so thus not going to be moving anywhere or bred, I think it's becoming a bit overblown here.
     
  10. TeaLovingDave

    TeaLovingDave Moderator Staff Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Posts:
    14,735
    Location:
    Wilds of Northumberland
    Firstly, there are multiple strains and the key factor that has allowed the ultra-lethal one to arise is the exposure of multiple species and strains together; this is the same principle which allows viruses such as influenza to manifest much more severe strains on occasion, such as when a strain of avian flu entered human circulation and combined with a swine flu strain already circulating in the 1910s and produced the pandemic strain of 1918. Therefore biosecurity precautions are still important even though EEHV is already a problem, because further strain recombination could occur.

    Secondly, the same principle applies to other pathogens which are currently *not* an issue; given the effect EEHV has had, we don't want to risk something else emerging through the same pathway.

    Or to put it another way using a similar example; just because chytrid is already circulating in amphibian populations, it doesn't mean there's no point upholding biosecurity.
     
    Brum, amur leopard, lintworm and 3 others like this.