Join our zoo community

ZooChat European Cup Round 2: Jardin des Plantes vs Copenhagen

Discussion in 'ZooChat Cup' started by CGSwans, 27 Nov 2018.

?

Ectotherms and miscellaneous mammals

Poll closed 30 Nov 2018.
  1. Copenhagen

    92.3%
  2. Jardin des Plantes

    7.7%
  1. CGSwans

    CGSwans Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    3,288
    Location:
    Melbourne
    (Arguably) the world's oldest zoo was no doubt pleased to draw a strength category in round one, seeing off Edinburgh and Paignton with miscellaneous mammals. They won't be terribly displeased with what Copenhagen has brought to the table either: ectotherms.
     
  2. Ned

    Ned Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    20 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,340
    Location:
    .
    Why has Copenhagen got 5 votes? What ectotherms and miscellaneous mammals do they have?
     
  3. Vision

    Vision Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    29 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    1,091
    Location:
    Antwerp, Belgium
    I think the main aspects putting Copenhagen above Paris in this match-up are the "Tasmania" and "Tropical Zoo" areas: Copenhagen has probably one of the only (if not the only) large Tasmanian-focused exhibit in European zoos, with devils, grey kangaroos, red-necked wallabies and wombats in modern and attractive enclosures. "Tropical Zoo" focuses on worldwide jungles and includes a large butterfly walkthrough, West African crocodiles, and a variety of well-designed enclosures for fish, reptiles, amphibians, and (if I recall correctly) a few larger inverts.
    Besides those two exhibits they also have a few enclosures for miscellaneous mammals dotted around the zoo, that all seem adequate for the animals' needs.

    Paris is interesting because collection-wise it is perhaps slightly superior (definitely in the reptile department, not sure about the mammals), but a lot of the zoo seems fairly mix-matched... The miscellaneous mammals are somewhat randomly dotted around the zoo in exhibits that don't really highlight them or make them memorable (though seeing quolls in daylight is fairly unique). The reptiles are spread between two reptile houses that have a lot of species, but most of those are in enclosures that seem barely large enough, or enclosures that just aren't very attractive.

    My vote definitely goes to Copenhagen here. I thoroughly enjoyed my visits to both zoos, but in this category Copenhagen should definitely win.
     
  4. Hvedekorn

    Hvedekorn Well-Known Member 15+ year member

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    597
    Location:
    Skive, Denmark
    Copenhagen also has some nice exhibits for brown rats and Egyptian fruit bats in their night house, in case that might swing people's opinions. Just too bad for the misc. mammals category that their night house - with a mind-blowing collection of three species - isn't anywhere near Frankfurt/Antwerp/Berlin/Riga levels.

    I haven't visited Paris, and I haven't actually seen Copenhagen's Tasmania area yet, but going by what I know about Paris (many quite old exhibits and, as mentioned above, some weird mismatching), I'll still let the wombats/devils and the tropical house's ectotherm department - which is not huge or fancy, but reasonably well-done - win here.

    But I'm not sure if I'd call it a landslide. Both zoos seem to be on a medium tier in both categories where they won't stand a chance against the top guns of Europe, but aren't completely rudimentary either.
     
    Last edited: 30 Nov 2018
    Vision likes this.