Join our zoo community

No Pronghorn OutSide America?!

Discussion in 'General Zoo Discussion' started by Gforrestersmith, 23 Sep 2011.

Tags:
  1. ThylacineAlive

    ThylacineAlive Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    10,699
    Location:
    Connecticut, U.S.A.
    As did Beardsley, though I'm not sure the calf survived very long as they seemed to drop down to a single male very quickly after the birth (I think a first for New England?).

    I'm not saying Pronghorn can't live and even breed outside their native range, they can (the nominate subspecies moreso than the SSP subspecies peninsularis). It just seems as though they do not thrive as well.

    ~Thylo
     
    TinoPup likes this.
  2. nczoofan

    nczoofan Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2018
    Posts:
    1,471
    Location:
    Texas
    Isn’t Queens down to just 2 pronghorn. I thought I saw that on there USDA report. They had bred a few in recent years, but Pronghorn seem very prone to these population fluctuations.
     
    ThylacineAlive likes this.
  3. ThylacineAlive

    ThylacineAlive Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    10,699
    Location:
    Connecticut, U.S.A.
    Not quite sure tbh, I think they still had three at the start of 2021 but that could have changed over the past 16 months.

    ~Thylo
     
  4. Kudu21

    Kudu21 Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    2,257
    Location:
    US
    ZIMS lists 2.0 for Queens.
     
    nczoofan and ThylacineAlive like this.
  5. ThylacineAlive

    ThylacineAlive Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    20 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    10,699
    Location:
    Connecticut, U.S.A.
    Lost the female then. Considering the species seem to live permanently semi-off-show I wouldn't be surprised if they phase them out entirety once the two boys go.

    I don't think Roger Williams plans to continue with the species once the current animals go either.

    ~Thylo
     
    nczoofan likes this.
  6. Kudu21

    Kudu21 Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    2,257
    Location:
    US
    Like it has been repeated multiple times here, they really just do not seem to thrive outside of their native range. They are very prone to parasitic infections and respiratory issues, in addition to just being quite fragile and flighty. Columbus is also down to a single individual.
     
  7. elefante

    elefante Well-Known Member 10+ year member

    Joined:
    12 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    North Dakota, USA
    I didn't know they were native to Minnesota. They are rarely found east of the Missouri in either one of the Dakotas.
     
    Gondwana likes this.
  8. Gondwana

    Gondwana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2019
    Posts:
    255
    Location:
    USA
    They were probably more numerous in the past but now very rarely observed in Minnesota and there is no permanent population. The last well-documented individual was in the northwestern part of the state in 2014.
     
  9. evilmonkey239

    evilmonkey239 Well-Known Member 5+ year member

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2018
    Posts:
    488
    Location:
    Michigan
    Yeah, but not to eastern Minnesota, which is a more humid part of the state.